Samuel Pepys and the World He Lived In — Reading Companion
Edition facts
Before opening Samuel Pepys and the World He Lived In — Reading Companion, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 80,669 words, 5 hr 51 min estimated reading time, and 36 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 19.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Pepys, Samuel, 1633-1703,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
mediate yet not sensuous truths, having their evidence in themselves; or the imagination or idealizing power, by symbols mediating between the reason and the understanding), but on this account more broadly and luxuriantly branching out from the upper trunk.”--COLERIDGE’s MS. note in his copy of the “Diary” (_Notes and Queries_, 1st S. vol. vi. p. 215).
Samuel Pepys was the first of a well-established stock to make a name in the outer world, but since his time the family can boast of having had amongst its members a Court physician, a bishop, and a lord chancellor.
The earliest recorded Pepys was named Thomas, and appears, on the authority of the Court Rolls of the manor of Pelhams, in Cottenham, to have been bailiff of the Abbot of Crowland’s lands in Cambridgeshire, in the early part of the reign of Henry VI.[1] From that time the family flourished, and there seems to be some reason for believing that certain members enriched themselves with the spoils of the abbey lands in the time of Henry VIII.
Before the Diarist became known, one of the most distinguished members of the family was Richard Pepys, created Lord Chief Justice of Ireland by Charles I. When the King was executed, Richard resigned his office; but he enjoyed the favour of Cromwell, and resumed the place. As he did not die until 1678, it is strange that there should be no allusion to him in the “Diary.”
The branch from which Samuel was descended had not much money; and his father, being a younger son, came to London and became a tailor. This descent in the social scale has caused much misapprehension, and his enemies did not forget to taunt him on his connection with tailoring; but it is a well-accredited axiom that trade does not injure gentry. Some remarks of Pepys himself upon his family have been greatly misunderstood. Referring to the non-appearance of any account of the Pepyses in Fuller’s “Worthies,” he writes:--“But I believe, indeed, our family were never considerable.”[2] Dr. Doran paraphrased this into: “Let others say of his family what they might: he, for his own part, did not believe that it was of anything like gentle descent.”[3] This is a pure blunder, for Pepys merely meant that none of the family had made much mark; and he would have been very indignant had any one told him that they were not gentle.
Samuel, the fifth child of John and Margaret Pepys, was born on February 23rd, 1632, either at Brampton, a village near Huntingdon, or in London. There is something to be said in favour of each supposition, but, as the registers of Brampton church do not commence until the year 1654,[4] the question cannot now be definitely settled. We have Pepys’s own authority for the statement that his father and mother were married at Newington, in Surrey, on October 15th, 1626.[5] The register of marriages of St. Mary, Newington, has been searched, but the name of Pepys occurs neither in the years 1625, 1626, nor in 1627,[6] and Mrs. John Pepys’s maiden name is still unknown. In early youth, Samuel went to a school at Huntingdon, as appears by a passage in the “Diary” (March 15th, 1659–60), where he writes: “I met Tom Alcock, one that went to school with me at Huntingdon, but I had not seen him this sixteen years.” He seems to have spent his youth pretty equally between town and country, for on one occasion, when he was walking over the fields to Kingsland, he remembered the time when, as a boy, he lived there, and “used to shoot with my bow and arrow in these fields.”[7] When he left Huntingdon he entered St. Paul’s School, and remained there until he had reached the age of seventeen. In after life, on the occasion of an official visit to Mercers’ Hall, he remembered the time when he was a petitioner for his exhibition.[8] He was a stout Roundhead in his boyish days, and this fact was remarked upon, to his great chagrin, in after years, by his friend and schoolfellow Mr. Christmas. He went to see the execution of Charles I. at Whitehall, and made himself conspicuous by saying on his return that, were he to preach upon the event of the day, he should select as his text the verse: “The memory of the wicked shall rot.” He was in some fear that Mr. Christmas might remember this also, but he was happy to find that that gentleman had left school before the incident occurred.[9] Pepys always took a lively interest in the welfare of his school, to which references are frequently made in the “Diary.”
Henry B. Wheatley's Samuel Pepys and the World He Lived In (1880) is not a biography in the usual sense. As the preface states, the title 'sufficiently explains the object aimed at': to draw together incidents from the diary and illustrate them from other sources. Wheatley uses the Rev. Mynors Bright edition but refers to entries by date, making the volume a companion to any edition. The work is organized thematically, with chapters on naval administration, social customs, and the personalities of Pepys's circle.
A Companion, Not a Life
Wheatley explicitly disclaims a complete analysis of Pepys's life or diary. Instead, he offers a 'complete analysis of the entire work or of the incidents of Pepys's life' only in the sense of grouping related diary entries. The preface notes that 'several of the circumstances of Pepys's life are here brought prominently forward for the first time,' suggesting original research. The book's structure reflects this: chapters cover topics like the Navy Office, Pepys's colleagues, and the manners of the age, with extensive footnotes citing manuscripts such as Harleian MS. 249 and State Papers.
Naval Administration as a Central Thread
Wheatley devotes substantial space to the workings of the Restoration navy. He includes detailed lists of officers and salaries, compiled by Colonel Pasley, and reproduces regulations from the 'Œconomy of His Majesty's Navy Office.' The excerpts show Pepys's own role as Clerk of the Acts, with entries like 'July 7, 1660' and 'Nov. 9, 1663' cited. Wheatley also discusses the Duke of York's 'Reflections' on the Navy Board's duties, drawing on Harleian MS. 6003. This focus aligns with the catalog subject 'Cabinet officers' but goes beyond biography into institutional history.
The Diary as a Source of Character
Wheatley uses the diary to expose the failings of Pepys's contemporaries. He quotes a satirical verse about Lord Brouncker and his wife, and notes that 'it would have been well for the fame of most of them if Pepys had never put pen to paper.' The book also includes anecdotes about naval pay and morale, such as English sailors on Dutch ships saying 'We did heretofore fight for tickets; now we fight for dollars!' (June 14, 1667). These details illustrate the catalog subject 'Great Britain -- Social life and customs -- 17th century' through concrete, often unflattering, examples.
Readers should approach this book as a scholarly companion to the diary itself. Wheatley assumes familiarity with Pepys's text and focuses on contextualizing its references. The extensive footnotes and appendices, including lists of naval officers, reward careful study. Those seeking a straightforward narrative of Pepys's life may find the thematic organization challenging, but for understanding the administrative and social world behind the diary, Wheatley's work remains a valuable resource.
There’s something touching about Wheatley sifting through Pepys’s words by lamplight, trying to piece together a life from scraps of naval business and private worry. It reminds me of another kind of patient reconstruction, the slow gathering of a man’s story from contested ground, much like the one found in An Old New Zealander; or, Te Rauparaha, the Napoleon of the South. — Edition Insights. Histories are just that—long, quiet looking back.
Take a moment to reflect on this book
Create a short personal record of your experience with this book.
Isabella Clark
3 weeks ago