An island hell: A Soviet prison in the far north — Story, Setting & Ideas

(1 User reviews)   154
In Category - Diaries Journals
Malʹsagov, S. A. (Sozerko Artaganovich), 1893-1976, Lyon, F. H. (Francis Hamilton), 1885- [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2022 Not confirmed
Malʹsagov, S. A. (Sozerko Artaganovich), 1893-1976; Solovetskii lagerʹ osobogo naznacheniia -- History; Prisons -- Russia (Federation) -- Solovetski Islands -- History; Prisoners -- Soviet Union -- Biography Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 36,181
Reading time 158 min
Text sections 25

Before opening An island hell: A Soviet prison in the far north — Story, Setting & Ideas, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 36,181 words, 2 hr 38 min estimated reading time, and 25 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 18.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Malʹsagov, S. A. (Sozerko Artaganovich), 1893-1976,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

A 1926 firsthand account by a White Guard officer who escaped from the Solovetsky Islands prison camp. The narrative details camp hierarchy, hunger strikes, and the author's flight across the Russian-Finnish border, offering specific observations on the treatment of political prisoners and common criminals.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

ence thought fit to rescue me, by a miracle, from this place of torment. And I count it my most sacred duty to tell the world what I saw, heard and went through there.

These notes, of course, make no claim either to literary qualities and beauty of style or to exhaustive completeness. I look upon them as the testimony of a fair witness who speaks the truth and only the truth. And if my testimony is recognised as worthy of consideration, and is accepted as a part of that gigantic indictment which the Russian nation, the whole of humanity, history and God will without doubt bring forward against the Soviet power, I shall consider that my duty has been discharged.

In confirmation of my claim to have been, to the best of my power, impartial in my exposition of the facts, I may say that when I showed these notes to my comrades who escaped with me they were of opinion that, in my description of the regime in the Solovetsky Islands, I had in many cases been too moderate.

PART I (_Introductory_)

FROM BATOUM TO THE SOLOVETSKY ISLANDS

A WHITE GUARD IN THE CAUCASUS

_Denikin's Failure — Guerilla Warfare — An Unexpected Blow — The Elusive Tchelokaeff — A Treaty that is Observed._

Before proceeding to my main task — an account of the conditions in the Soviet prisons in the Solovetsky Islands — I should like to dwell briefly on the period of my life which immediately preceded my transportation to that place. I think that this period is of more than merely personal interest. As far as I know, the punitive activities of the Soviet power in the Caucasus after the crushing of the armed anti-Bolshevist rebellion there have not found a place in any book of memoirs.

At the time of the final retreat of General Denikin's forces I was in the ranks of the Caucasian Army (on the Tsaritsin front). The disaster to the Volunteer Army compelled us all to take refuge in the mountains. Keeping touch all the time with the attacking enemy, our cavalry brigade reached the river Terek, where it was dissolved. The most reliable elements of it crossed the frontier of Georgia, at that time still an independent State.

In Georgia, the members of the brigade who were fit for service were incorporated by Keletch Sultan Hire in a cavalry regiment. Its duties were to execute raids on the Soviet rear and throw it into confusion, to destroy roads and excite rebellion against the Bolsheviks.

The raid into the Kuban planned in the summer of 1920 by the staff of General Wrangel, who was then in the Crimea with his army, gave Sultan Hire the idea of sending us also to the Kuban in the hope of inciting the Cossacks to rebellion. In the Kuban, we took part in the retirement of the invading troops to the Crimea, the raid having considerably outgrown its original dimensions. The bold plan of bringing about a rising did not succeed. We were dissolved once more.

In exceptionally difficult conditions, surrounded by troops of the Red Army, we formed a new detachment under the command of Colonel X (I cannot give the colonel's name; he is still carrying on guerilla warfare with the Soviet power in the Caucasus). Our detachment, despite its small numbers, waged warfare of a kind with success, and we were beginning to think of operations on a larger scale, when we unexpectedly lost the support on which we absolutely depended and counted; the famous "national rebellion" took place in Georgia. In reality the country was occupied, almost without resistance, by regular troops of the Red Army. Our detachment retired fighting through the wild mountains to Batoum. Here part of it was broken up and turned into larger or smaller bodies of insurgents, part left for Anatolia.

I made my way to Ajaristan. Thence communication was established with Trebizond, where Y lived; his name, too, I cannot give in full for the reason stated above. Until the autumn of 1922 we and Y organised frequent raids on the Soviet Russian frontier.

Then, as now, the unofficial direction of the whole insurgent movement in the Caucasus was in the hands of the well-known Colonel Tchelokaeff. Thanks to extensive help from the population, which sympathises with the "Whites," and to his own bravery and skill, the Bolsheviks have found Tchelokaeff quite uncatchable.

From the opening pages, Malsagoff frames his account as a legal testimony: he calls his notes 'the testimony of a fair witness who speaks the truth and only the truth.' The book is structured in three parts, moving from his arrest in the Caucasus to the Solovetsky Islands and finally to his escape across the Finnish border. The table of contents reveals a systematic approach, with chapters on camp administration, daily life, and specific prisoner categories such as 'Counter-Revolutionaries' and 'Politicals.'

The excerpts show that Malsagoff does not claim literary polish; he states his notes 'make no claim either to literary qualities and beauty of style or to exhaustive completeness.' Instead, he insists on factual reporting, a stance that shapes the book's direct, documentary tone.

A Witness, Not a Writer

Malsagoff explicitly distances his work from literature, calling it 'the testimony of a fair witness.' This is not modesty but a deliberate rhetorical choice. The prose is plain, almost legalistic, with frequent references to dates, numbers, and specific incidents. For example, he notes that the hunger strike of 1924 lasted thirteen days, resulting in several deaths and about a hundred hospitalizations. He also records the exact rations won by political prisoners: '2 lbs. of bread (white and black), 1 lb. of meat, good butter, milk, eggs, etc.'

This precision extends to the escape narrative, which is broken into stages with chapter titles like 'Our Flight: The First Stage' and 'A Terrible March.' The author's voice is that of a reporter, not a memoirist, and he often addresses the reader directly, as when he explains that the Solovky were 'absolutely unknown' outside Soviet Russia because no prisoner had previously escaped across the frontier.

Hierarchies of Suffering

The excerpts reveal a complex social order among prisoners. Malsagoff distinguishes between 'K.R.'s' (counter-revolutionaries), 'shpana' (criminals), and 'politicals' (Socialists and party men). He notes that politicals, despite being ideological opponents of the Bolsheviks, secured better conditions through collective action. The discipline among Socialists, he writes, 'excels even that of the shpana.'

One striking incident involves a skating rink: in winter 1923, politicals built a rink near the monastery, sang revolutionary songs, and were fired upon by Nogteff's troops, killing nine. The politicals then declared a hunger strike, forcing a commission from Moscow. Malsagoff records that Nogteff was not punished—the commission ruled he acted in self-defense. This episode illustrates both the prisoners' organized resistance and the administration's impunity.

Malsagoff also notes an 'atrocious injustice': politicals did no work, while K.R.'s bore the brunt of labor. This hierarchy complicates any simple victim narrative.

Escape as Evidence

The third part of the book, 'Our Escape,' is the most dramatic but also the most carefully documented. Malsagoff and four companions left the Solovetsky Islands on May 18, 1925, and crossed into Finland on June 15—a journey of thirty-six days. He emphasizes that no prisoner had ever succeeded in escaping across the frontier before, which is why the outside world knew nothing of the camp.

The escape narrative is not romanticized. Chapter titles like 'A Terrible March' and 'Laying our Plans' suggest a methodical, harrowing ordeal. Malsagoff's purpose is evident: he wants his flight to serve as proof of the camp's conditions. By reaching Finland, he could present his testimony to European audiences. The book itself is that testimony, and the escape is its climax—not a thrilling adventure but a piece of evidence that the Solovky existed and that the truth could be carried out.

Readers should approach this book as a primary document rather than a polished memoir. Malsagoff's biases are clear: he is a White Guard officer, hostile to Bolshevism, and he writes to indict the Soviet system. Yet his attention to detail—dates, rations, numbers of dead—gives the account a forensic quality. The excerpts show a man who believes that facts alone can convict. For those studying Soviet prison camps, this is an early, firsthand report from a survivor who risked everything to get the story out.

That Solovetsky account stayed with me—how a man holds onto his inner thread through sheer isolation. It reminded me of something quieter I once read, Leaves from My Journal: Third Book of the Faith-Promoting Series Designed for the Instruction and Encouragement of Young Latter-Day Saints — Text and Context, where faith, not escape, becomes the daily act of survival. Different prisons, same stubborn light.

Luke Lopez
3 weeks ago

5
5 out of 5 (1 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
  • ...
    Lynn Sweeney - 1 month ago
    {'rating': 4, 'text': 'A chilling and eye-opening account of a Soviet prison camp in the far north. The author vividly describes the brutal conditions, the psychological toll on prisoners, and the arbitrary nature of justice under Stalin. This personal narrative is a powerful warning against totalitarianism and a tribute to human endurance. A gripping and important read.'}

  • ...
    Jesus Rogers - 1 month ago
    {'rating': 3, 'text': "The book provides a stark depiction of life in the Soviet gulag, but the narrative is somewhat fragmented and occasionally repetitive. The author's experiences are harrowing, but the recounting lacks a consistent timeline, making it hard to follow. Still, the authenticity of the account is undeniable, and it offers a rare look at a forgotten part of Soviet history."}

  • ...
    Joseph Herring - 4 weeks ago
    {'rating': 2, 'text': "While the subject is tragic, this memoir lacks the literary quality and depth of other gulag accounts. The writing is flat, and the author's descriptions are often clinical, failing to evoke the emotional weight of the experience. The story jumps around, and the lack of historical context makes it difficult to fully grasp the significance of the events. A missed opportunity."}


Reader reflection

What was your reading experience?

Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

How likely are you to recommend this book?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks